Is Your Risk Adjustment Solution Missing the Mark? 3 Questions to Ask Now!

Persivia
3 min readMar 27, 2024

In the world of healthcare, accurate risk adjustment is crucial. It ensures fair reimbursement for providers by reflecting the health complexity of their patient population. But with a growing emphasis on value-based care, is a traditional Risk Adjustment Solution enough?

Is Your Risk Adjustment Solution Missing the Mark? 3 Questions to Ask Now!

Here are the three key questions to ask yourself if you suspect your current solution might be falling short:

1. Does it Capture the Full Picture of Patient Health?

HCC (Hierarchical Condition Category) coding is a cornerstone of risk adjustment. It translates diagnoses into codes that determine risk scores. However, HCC coding relies heavily on claims data, which often lacks details about a patient’s current health status.

Here’s where the limitations lie:

  • Limited Time Window: Claims data typically reflects diagnoses from the past year, potentially missing recent developments impacting a patient’s health.
  • Incomplete Picture: Claims might not capture social determinants of health that significantly influence risk.

The Solution: Leverage Additional Data Sources

Modern risk adjustment solution goes beyond claims data. They incorporate:

  • Clinical Data: Electronic health records provide a richer picture of current diagnoses, medications, and past medical history.
  • Point of Care Data: Real-time data collected during patient visits can reveal crucial details about a patient’s current health status.
  • Natural Language Processing: NLP can automate the extraction of relevant health data from clinical notes, improving coding accuracy and completeness.

2. Does it Streamline Workflow and Reduce Coding Errors?

Manual HCC coding is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Traditional solutions might offer limited support for automation or lack integration with EHR systems. This can lead to:

  • Increased Coding Costs: Manual coding requires dedicated staff, driving up operational expenses.
  • Coding Errors: Inaccurate coding can result in under- or over-capturing of risk, impacting reimbursement.

The Solution: Look for Automation and Integration

Advanced RAS offers features like:

  • Automated Coding Tools: These tools leverage NLP and machine learning to automate code assignments based on clinical documentation, reducing human error and coding time.
  • EHR Integration: Seamless integration with EHR systems allows for direct data transfer, minimizing manual data entry and ensuring data accuracy.

3. Does it Provide Actionable Insights?

Risk adjustment isn’t just about coding. Ideally, your solution should empower you to take action on the insights it generates. Here’s where some solutions fall short:

  • Limited Reporting Capabilities: Traditional solutions might offer basic reports but lack advanced analytics to identify high-risk patients or gaps in care.
  • No Actionable Guidance: Reports might simply present data without offering insights into how to improve risk capture or patient care.

The Solution: Leverage Data for Better Care

Modern solutions provide robust reporting and analytics features, allowing you to:

  • Identify High-Risk Patients: Proactively target high-risk patients for care management programs to improve their health outcomes.
  • Close Care Gaps: Identify patients with under-coded conditions and ensure they receive appropriate care.
  • Optimize Resource Allocation: Allocate resources more effectively based on patient needs identified through risk stratification.

Explore more at Persivia. Get a quote now!

--

--

Persivia

Our Population Health Management Platform helps Payers & Providers manage multiple VBC models across the entire continuum of care.